Today, there are alot of things that are produced that don't look quite like they should at all, and they can still be a "pure" subspecies, and I suppose this "could" possibly be the case with this one too. But although it does have a sockhead, the jagged edges of it, and the snout just DO NOT look like campbelli traits to me. The rounded blotches that don't go completely around instead of rings is another thing that definitely looks out of place too.



It looks cool, but I would bet money that it isn't 100% campbelli, but it certainly couldn't be proven in court without parent lineage, or even other clutch siblings to look at and compare. If all the other clutch-mates looked odd like that,or in other strange out of character ways, there's no way it could be all campbelli.



Anyway, that's what I see for what it's worth.





best regards, ~Doug
-----
"Better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open mouth and remove any doubt!"

[ Hide Replies ]

• milksnake hybrid?! - fliptop, Mon Oct 12 19:18:49 2009
• RE: milksnake hybrid?! - mingdurga, Mon Oct 12 20:40:43 2009
• I agree............... - phil bradley, Tue Oct 13 15:56:11 2009
• Thanks and another ? - fliptop, Tue Oct 13 16:56:32 2009
• RE: I agree............... - Ken_kaniff, Wed Oct 14 19:17:59 2009
• RE: I agree............... - fliptop, Wed Oct 14 20:18:21 2009
• RE: I agree............... - phil bradley, Thu Oct 15 10:40:53 2009
• RE: milksnake hybrid?! - DMong, Mon Oct 12 21:28:21 2009
• RE: milksnake hybrid?! - MikeRusso, Mon Oct 12 21:58:34 2009
• Like the others have... - RG, Tue Oct 13 07:52:32 2009
• milksnake ............... - JYohe, Tue Oct 13 17:20:58 2009