**I think you need to look up the words smear and then the word campaign. **



You're right. I went back and looked up those words in webster's and I was wrong - I apologize. I was using both words incorrectly. I guess I never really knew what the definitions of those words are. I've been using them in the wrong way my whole life.



**My original post was IN REPLY to Eric's post that used a little humor to agree with him, then to Brad's post - again humor to convey MY OPINION, then we had our stupid little dance.**



It is funny that you can't see it. You have maligned (see, I didn't use smear here - I had to look up malign to make sure I used that correctly - thanks for the reality check) Dan (without proof), me (without proof), Ric Blair (without proof - by the way I've seen several profanity laced emails regarding him authored by rpelez), Dave Doherty (acknowledged by him, but not an intentional oversight). You are one of the least trusting individuals I have seen. There was never this type of venom in the 70's and 80's. Thank you for infusing that into our hobby.



**Again, I will repeat something that apparently a lot of people have problems with; FOR ME - I will not be convinced that the Hueco line producing speckled offspring with triple alternates is pure until someone other than Dan Johnson, Dan Doherty or you collects another documented wc Hueco with those traits. **



Fine. Keep in mind - that is FOR YOU. You do not speak for the entire alterna community. Do you really think that you do? It is VERY interesting that both Dan and I have been included in your list. Can you explain why that is? Have I ever misrepresented an animal to you or anyone? Has Dan? Your bias has no basis - do you see that?

[ Show Entire Thread ]