**> You are right about one thing - I can't see the malignment.

Venom? Again you're mis-using your words, so let's review:



Dan Johnson - it is my opinion (and it is a shared, albeit minority opinion) that something is not quite right with his Hueco line.**



How am I misuising my words? I see the venom. Are you saying it isn't there?



**Glenn Fankhauser - I got news for you, you were "maligned" in that thread about the Study Butte alterna, not in anything I posted unless you're referring to your exclusion from my wc Hueco list, and that is a direct a reflection of the Study Butte thrashing that you received from Ricky Green and Joe.**



Yes, and you continue the maligning. I'd like to add - how was I thrashed? I'd also like to add, how is their opinion proof that I'm lying? How is your opinion proof that I'm lying?



**Ric Blair - please foward me those profanity laced emails that I supposedly authored. Just one please...maybe I wrote one in my sleep.



Done. Can you deny that you said what I quoted?



**> For Dan it's obvious - it has to be someone independent of his line. For you, again it's a reflection of that Study Butte thread.**



Again, why is that obvious? Maybe you should get someone to independently corroborate your 8 is great story. Why does Dan need corroboration if you don't? Again, let me reiterate...was I outed as a liar in the Study Butte thread? Does anyone have proof against what I claim?



Again, is is possible for you to answer my questions posed many posts ago? I answered yours, why cannot you reciprocate?



Also, it is tonight. What were we supposed to wait to 'see tonight?'

[ Show Entire Thread ]