Posted by:
aspidites
at Thu Oct 22 13:42:12 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by aspidites ]
**You can love what you will ,to me the snake looks bug eyed .I am glad you love what you do .I will not take that away .**
Because you think a snake looks bug-eyed does not make it so.
**I simply think the snake is ugly and will always think it is ugly bug eyed or not.**
It is fine if you think it is ugly. But to claim that one of the reasons it is ugly is because it is bug-eyed when it actually isn't is unfair.
**Any time a morph is involved it is inbreeding ,read it he inbred to produce this snake .**
Not true. What if two morphs are bred together that were hatched from different lines? Not inbreeding. I don't want to get into the differences between inbreeding and linebreeding. Plus, one can occasionally outcross to 'repair' any supposed damage by inbreeding.
**I simply believe that a corn fed population of inbred morphs will destroy any population in captivity and be plagued with the problems already associated with inbred wild life .**
How exactly are captive snake populations wild life? How are any populations of snakes in captivity not inbred, regardless of mutations? Wouldn't non-morphs be also corn fed and inbred? Do you feed your snakes only wild collected lizards/birds/deer mice? Also, how can the morphs destroy the captive population if there are those who don't breed the morphs into their collection? Do morphs destroy your population of snakes at your home?
**A genetic fact !!!!!!!!!!! The snake is a ugly inbred genetic mutant.If you like it, then do so, I do not.**
Not a genetic fact. Many breeds of domesticated animals are a result of inbreeding. Doesn't necessarily mean that they are inferior or less healthy. Also doesn't mean that these mutations harm the rest of the population.
[ Hide Replies ]
- BUG EYES - lep1pic1, Wed Oct 21 22:34:00 2009
|
RE: BUG EYES - aspidites, Thu Oct 22 13:42:12 2009