Posted by:
Bolitochrome
at Mon Nov 16 15:49:09 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Bolitochrome ]
1) I am working on a model for a male.
2) I made the assumption that I was estimating the value of the mother based on her ability to create more morphs of her own phenotype because that was the primary basis of the argument below. "I paid $**** for my albino/pied/spider/pin/etc female and now they are only worth $****"
3) The exaggerated death rate was done on purpose.
4) The exaggerated depreciation in clutch value was done that way on purpose. It does decay logarithmically, depending on what you mean by that. I graphed the depreciation value (1 / year of clutch) by year below.
-----
Lincoln, NE
0.1 Pastel, 1.0 Pastel het Pied, 0.1 Pied, 0.1 Cinn, 1.0 Black Pewter, 1.1 Normals, 1.0 Thayeri, 0.1 Thayeri X Alterna, 0.1 crazy cat, 1.0 husband
[ Hide Replies ]
- Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 11:39:02 2009
- Sharing - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 12:06:53 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Zefdin, Mon Nov 16 13:24:59 2009
- Exactly - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 14:08:08 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbe - toshamc, Mon Nov 16 14:26:38 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Watever, Mon Nov 16 15:23:53 2009
 The Model - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 15:49:09 2009  - Ran it again - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 16:11:49 2009
- Fun to think about but way too hard..... - Wallbanger26, Mon Nov 16 18:36:22 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - BillWhaley, Tue Nov 17 16:29:27 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Rich_Crowley, Tue Nov 17 21:17:12 2009
|
