Posted by:
Bolitochrome
at Mon Nov 16 18:28:14 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Bolitochrome ]
This is just a model, it isn't meant to mimic reality in the closest sense of the word. It is based on extrema and estimations. It's only purpose is to paint a picture of "what ifs" based on the averages of market fluctuations, price depreciation, and overall costs. It is not supposed to be an absolute accurate image of how the depreciation of the Spider morph actually occured, but an example of how *any* of the morphs could depreciate.
If you would like to run the model with your own parameters I would be glad to send it to you.
I ran the model assuming the female's morph genotype was dominant since every keeps telling me (and anyone else who asks this forum) that Spider is/can be dominant. I am working on a models for males, and for females and males of codominant and recessive genotypes. I might not post them here unless requested though. ----- Lincoln, NE
0.1 Pastel, 1.0 Pastel het Pied, 0.1 Pied, 0.1 Cinn, 1.0 Black Pewter, 1.1 Normals, 1.0 Thayeri, 0.1 Thayeri X Alterna, 0.1 crazy cat, 1.0 husband
[ Hide Replies ]
- Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 11:39:02 2009
- Sharing - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 12:06:53 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Zefdin, Mon Nov 16 13:24:59 2009
- Exactly - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 14:08:08 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbe - toshamc, Mon Nov 16 14:26:38 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Watever, Mon Nov 16 15:23:53 2009
- The Model - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 15:49:09 2009

- Ran it again - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 16:11:49 2009
- RE: Ran it again - TerryHeuring, Mon Nov 16 16:23:30 2009
- RE: Ran it again - toshamc, Mon Nov 16 17:32:19 2009
It is a model - Bolitochrome, Mon Nov 16 18:28:14 2009
- Fun to think about but way too hard..... - Wallbanger26, Mon Nov 16 18:36:22 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - BillWhaley, Tue Nov 17 16:29:27 2009
- RE: Breeding for Profit - Ran some numbers - Rich_Crowley, Tue Nov 17 21:17:12 2009
|