![]() | market - home |
![]() |
|
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Gray-banded Kingsnakes ] |
Posted by: rpelaez at Mon Nov 23 07:17:18 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by rpelaez ] This one may need a little research. I believe that one of the lynch pins for a successful Lacey Act prosecution is that the buyer (in a transaction involving illegally obtained wildlife) must possess reasonable knowledge that the wildlife has been obtained illegally. That standard of reasonableness is probably much different for a Komodo Dragon selling for $100, a Utah Milk Snake selling for $100 and an alterna selling for $100, which is why NO ONE should be discussing the year the parent stock was collected. In fact, when a seller makes it a point to inform the buyer that the snake (or parent stock) was collected from a public road during this road ban, chances are pretty good that the seller is part of a law enforcement sting-LOL. | ||
<< Previous Message: yes, it was Sept 1st 2007 (nt) - Joe Forks, Sun Nov 22 18:07:40 2009 | ||
|
|
|
|