I understand your feelings of limited sympathy for this person, just a little bit. Sure, he could have "just moved" (not that easy if he owned the house and couldn't sell it). But I am still enraged that a citizen who apparently had not been a problem to society up to the point the law changed, now has had his home violated and his property confiscated. Laws ought to exist to serve a particular purpose. What purpose does this law serve? To make reviled outlaws out of otherwise law-abiding, productive citizens?



Can you enlighten us, who brought the bill to the state legislature? In other places it has been the animal rights movement. A few times it has been in response to an incident (escape; bite; animal neglect case; etc) involving animal(s). Was there an incident in WA that provoked this legislation? Or was the AR movement once again successful?



Thanks,

Jimi

[ Hide Replies ]

• WA Press: Officials seize 40 snakes - W von Papineäu, Sat Jan 16 16:11:27 2010
• OR Press: Seizure: What happens now? - W von Papineäu, Sat Jan 16 16:22:35 2010
• OR Press: Seizure: What happens now? - MandyandAlex, Sun Jan 17 10:09:57 2010
• RE: WA Press: Officials seize 40 snakes - Doug T, Mon Jan 18 16:46:32 2010
• RE: WA Press: Officials seize 40 snakes - jgragg, Mon Jan 18 19:47:28 2010
• RE: WA Press: Officials seize 40 snakes - Doug T, Tue Jan 19 01:11:16 2010
• RE: WA Press: Officials seize 40 snakes - jgragg, Tue Jan 19 08:24:04 2010