Posted by:
amazondoc
at Fri Jan 29 00:45:09 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by amazondoc ]
>>Full circle. You asked for justification on banning kings.
And I was not given any.
>>There is no scientific evidence to justify a ban ANY species, so how can there be evidence to ban kings??
There is more for the "big 9" than for kings. Feral populations, feral escapees, ingested endangered species, and so on. I don't know that there's ENOUGH evidence on the "big 9" to justify a total ban -- but there is more for them than for the kings.
-----
----
0.1 Peruvian rainbow boa (Amaru)
0.3 Honduran milksnakes (Chicchan, Chanir, Hari)
2.6 corns (Cetto, Tolosa, TBA)
1,000,000.1,000,000 other critters
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|
