Posted by:
jscrick
at Tue Feb 2 21:47:50 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by jscrick ]
Thanks to those that steered me to some information in an attempt to answer some of my questions on this. From what I read it pretty much confirms my suspicions. Certainly doesn't allay any.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying GE was a bunch of Boy Scouts. However, surreptitious clandestine law enforcement conspiracies carried out by law enforcement, quasi-law enforcement, NGO's, Non-profits/Charities on a bunch of trumped up contrived charges doesn't justify seizing everything. There does seem to be conflicts of interest, featherbedding, double dipping, and questions of ethics when the perpetrators/co-conspirators profit by animals and the windfall from services rendered because of the raid they deemed necessary.
These suspicions of mine have not as of yet been disproved. Quite the contrary. Better watch out retailers. Next they'll be telling you, you've got too many crickets in a tank, or too many dead ones, or not enough water...
jsc ----- "As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|