THESE 2 AREN'T TOO COOL
Subsection 671.1(a)(2) will be modified to allow that the department may enter all holding facilities, vehicles, vessels or other places where restricted species are kept or may be keptand these inspections may be made at any time with or without prior notification.

Subsection 671.1(a)(10) will be added to allow the Department to confer withother state and federal agencies or any other person or entityin order to verify information on the application or to determine if the importation, transportation, or possession of any animal requested will be in the best interest of the state and animal.



HOW DO THEY FIGURE?
Finally, the state has pre-determined that these changes will have “no” financial impact “because this regulation does not affect any local entity or program.”
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

[ Hide Replies ]

• California ban on nonnative frogs and tu - EricWI, Wed Feb 24 18:44:30 2010
• RE: California ban on nonnative frogs and tu - jscrick, Wed Feb 24 21:40:46 2010
• RE: California ban on nonnative frogs an - jenkznza, Thu Feb 25 10:42:21 2010
• RE: California ban on nonnative frogs an - biophile, Thu Feb 25 18:43:59 2010
• RE: California ban on nonnative frogs an - luhrsreptiles, Thu Feb 25 23:03:15 2010
• RE: California ban on nonnative frogs an - luhrsreptiles, Thu Feb 25 23:01:54 2010
• RE: California ban on nonnative frogs an - biophile, Fri Feb 26 08:58:40 2010