I watched a good portion of this show yesterday! What a bunch of over-sensationalized CRAP! I don't think they could shoot anymore "worm's eye views" or "snakes in the foreground" to make the people in the backgroung look smaller! I also never realized that these snakes were such a road hazard? Has there ever been a accident caused by a Burmese Python on the road? Oh, and where was PETA when they obviously staged a baby Burmese being constricted by a Florida King? Or when the raccoon was having his way w/one? I've NEVER owned a Burmese, Retic or African Rock or plan to, but enough is enough! This was an obvious attempt to scare the public and play on their ignorance! Shame on you PBS! I'm very dissapointed w/you!!!!

[ Hide Replies ]

• PBS's "Invasion of Pythons" - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 09:19:22 2010
• RE: PBS's "Invasion of Pythons" - PHLdyPayne, Sun Feb 28 11:42:24 2010
• On the contrary- - brhaco, Sun Feb 28 12:31:32 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 12:55:48 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - brhaco, Sun Feb 28 13:43:56 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 17:52:46 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - PHLdyPayne, Mon Mar 1 17:04:50 2010
• It was actually very good and beneficial - dustyrhoads, Sun Feb 28 18:01:27 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - AndrewPotts, Sun Feb 28 19:04:36 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 01:09:22 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Mar 1 07:03:45 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 10:35:05 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Mar 1 12:47:55 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 13:32:14 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Mar 1 16:14:57 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - AndrewPotts, Mon Mar 1 22:16:15 2010
• RE: What about the Ripple effect..? - AndrewPotts, Sun Feb 28 19:21:37 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 20:36:00 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 00:29:50 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sun Feb 28 21:15:12 2010
• Bottom Line - brhaco, Mon Mar 1 08:10:24 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 02:42:22 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Mar 2 06:11:49 2010
• Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ernie - brhaco, Tue Mar 2 07:34:00 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ernie - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Mar 2 07:38:05 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - brhaco, Tue Mar 2 08:12:25 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 09:19:53 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - dustyrhoads, Tue Mar 2 11:16:45 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - BRhaco, Tue Mar 2 11:46:52 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 13:21:43 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - BRhaco, Tue Mar 2 14:41:52 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - BRhaco, Tue Mar 2 14:54:29 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 15:33:07 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - brhaco, Tue Mar 2 16:25:17 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Mar 2 16:25:27 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - dustyrhoads, Tue Mar 2 14:07:21 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 16:31:12 2010