Excuse me for not always proofreading, grammatical errors aside the content of the post is what matters,I think you showed more of your groupie side then making any point.

Below is a fine example of how well Brad understands the biological world and his reading comprehension skills. Its a post I made, and Brads response, note how incredibly off target Brad is trying to address my mass extinction comment.Protecting habitat is not a safe guard against mass extinction, the earths greatest die offs have been associated with natural disasters of epic proportion and dramatic climate change. I think it was very clear that this is what I was elluding to, sorry if it went over your head.



Wouldn't it be ironic if the during the next mass extinction that hits the earth, the burms survived but the wood rats and ivory billed wood peckers didn't,

ERNIE EISON
WESTWOOD ACRES REPTILE FARM INC



Not ironic at all to an ecologist (a few of whom should be consulted by these politicians and regulators, it would seem ). HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT HABITAT!!!!!!!!!!


Brad Chambers

[ Show Entire Thread ]