Sorry Brad but you lose again. Had you simply said .... Not ironic at all to an ecologist Habitat Habitat, etc., your augment could possibly be viewed as valid but you choose to qualify your remark with the following (a few of whom should be consulted by these politicians and regulators, it would seem ). This makes it "crystal clear " that you were not referring to ANY kind of habitat disruption but being both specific and off the mark as I kindly pointed out. After you attacked me. You then went into this game, Bad form Brad. At this point I feel no further need to particpate in anymore of your round and round silliness. If you want to talk animals thats fine , if you want to just keep on taking shots, well ..............have at it ,

ERNIE EISON
WESTWOOD ACRES REPTILE FARM INC.

[ Hide Replies ]

• PBS's "Invasion of Pythons" - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 09:19:22 2010
• RE: PBS's "Invasion of Pythons" - PHLdyPayne, Sun Feb 28 11:42:24 2010
• On the contrary- - brhaco, Sun Feb 28 12:31:32 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 12:55:48 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - brhaco, Sun Feb 28 13:43:56 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 17:52:46 2010
• RE: On the contrary- - PHLdyPayne, Mon Mar 1 17:04:50 2010
• It was actually very good and beneficial - dustyrhoads, Sun Feb 28 18:01:27 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - AndrewPotts, Sun Feb 28 19:04:36 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 01:09:22 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Mar 1 07:03:45 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 10:35:05 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Mar 1 12:47:55 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 13:32:14 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Mar 1 16:14:57 2010
• RE: Biased and missed the Point - AndrewPotts, Mon Mar 1 22:16:15 2010
• RE: What about the Ripple effect..? - AndrewPotts, Sun Feb 28 19:21:37 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - BuzzardBall, Sun Feb 28 20:36:00 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - dustyrhoads, Mon Mar 1 00:29:50 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sun Feb 28 21:15:12 2010
• Bottom Line - brhaco, Mon Mar 1 08:10:24 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 02:42:22 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Mar 2 06:11:49 2010
• Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ernie - brhaco, Tue Mar 2 07:34:00 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ernie - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Mar 2 07:38:05 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - brhaco, Tue Mar 2 08:12:25 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 09:19:53 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - dustyrhoads, Tue Mar 2 11:16:45 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - BRhaco, Tue Mar 2 11:46:52 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 13:21:43 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - BRhaco, Tue Mar 2 14:41:52 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - BRhaco, Tue Mar 2 14:54:29 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 15:33:07 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - brhaco, Tue Mar 2 16:25:17 2010
• RE: Agree, Tom-one other suggestion, Ern - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Mar 2 16:25:27 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - dustyrhoads, Tue Mar 2 14:07:21 2010
• RE: It was actually very good and beneficial - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 2 16:31:12 2010