"As stated above, I fully realize these groups are supporting anti-invasive legislation, as are pretty much all biologists out there-I don't find this fact shocking in the least. Our job is to give them alternatives that do not destroy our hobby/industry."

Please see my above post on this point. Dave and Tracy Barker's proposal is a solution that may give biologists and politicians something else to consider.

[ Hide Replies ]

• Not the only ones under attack - jeffb, Tue Mar 9 11:27:21 2010
• NWO the elite little by little - catfishboa, Tue Mar 9 15:00:40 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - jscrick, Tue Mar 9 15:57:32 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - brhaco, Tue Mar 9 17:01:46 2010
• John's take on the big picture... - jscrick, Tue Mar 9 19:59:37 2010
• RE: John's take on the big picture... - brhaco, Tue Mar 9 21:17:57 2010
• RE: John's take on the big picture... - Aaron, Thu Mar 11 11:33:30 2010
• I wish that was the case... - Ravenspirit, Tue Mar 9 20:04:31 2010
• RE: I wish that was the case... - brhaco, Tue Mar 9 21:10:57 2010
• RE: I wish that was the case... - brhaco, Tue Mar 9 21:11:51 2010
• RE: I wish that was the case... - Ravenspirit, Tue Mar 9 22:47:12 2010
• RE: I wish that was the case... - webwheeler, Wed Mar 10 11:55:59 2010
• I'm for it. - jscrick, Wed Mar 10 16:05:29 2010
• RE: I wish that was the case... - luhrsreptiles, Wed Mar 10 16:31:46 2010
• RE: I wish that was the case... - brhaco, Wed Mar 10 17:15:12 2010
• RE: I wish that was the case... - luhrsreptiles, Wed Mar 10 17:21:00 2010
• You're preachin' to the choir, Mike. - jscrick, Wed Mar 10 19:09:11 2010
• Great idea - brhaco, Wed Mar 10 17:09:29 2010
• RE: Great idea - luhrsreptiles, Wed Mar 10 17:22:34 2010
• Thanks a bunch! NP. - Ravenspirit, Mon Mar 15 05:44:23 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - biophile, Tue Mar 9 21:42:17 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - WSTREPS, Tue Mar 9 21:47:13 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - brhaco, Tue Mar 9 22:47:30 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - WSTREPS, Wed Mar 10 07:59:53 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - brhaco, Wed Mar 10 08:12:34 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - luhrsreptiles, Wed Mar 10 11:10:02 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - BRhaco, Wed Mar 10 11:38:02 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - webwheeler, Wed Mar 10 12:05:38 2010
• I agree n/p - BRhaco, Wed Mar 10 12:47:09 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - luhrsreptiles, Wed Mar 10 15:17:59 2010
• The burden of proof - BRhaco, Wed Mar 10 15:40:08 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - busterlimes, Wed Mar 17 03:10:40 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - WSTREPS, Wed Mar 10 21:53:54 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - luhrsreptiles, Wed Mar 10 11:00:09 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - BRhaco, Wed Mar 10 11:45:39 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - luhrsreptiles, Wed Mar 10 15:09:34 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - BRhaco, Wed Mar 10 15:45:52 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - Ravenspirit, Thu Mar 11 07:45:03 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - brhaco, Thu Mar 11 08:13:09 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - Ravenspirit, Thu Mar 11 09:06:11 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - luhrsreptiles, Thu Mar 11 12:08:36 2010
• How could you have - BRhaco, Thu Mar 11 13:09:17 2010
• RE: How could you have - luhrsreptiles, Thu Mar 11 17:15:44 2010
• Or - brhaco, Thu Mar 11 18:49:43 2010
• RE:It's hard to support groups who.... - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 10 08:06:16 2010
• In that case- - brhaco, Wed Mar 10 08:20:25 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - mfoux, Wed Mar 10 15:54:36 2010
• RE: Not the only ones under attack - jscrick, Wed Mar 10 16:18:30 2010