Posted by:
USARK
at Wed Mar 24 10:20:35 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by USARK ]
As far as federal legislation or regulation there is NO COMPROMISE. The government position is fundamentally flawed and need to be scrapped. They are just wrong period!
Cooperation with scientists to reach pragmatic proposals to address real invasive species concerns in south Florida is a completely separate initiative. The Reptile Nation will respond to requests for help to meet challenges because we collectively have more expertise and experience with these animals than all the government scientists put together. In the past we have not been included in discussion on proposals. Now that we have established ourselves and have proved able to flex some political muscle they are now ready to listen. We are agreeing to engage and discuss. Nothing more.
In answer to your questions:
1. SREL is not a government agency. The are part of UGA. Although their study will be completed in June, the paper is not likely to be available till fall. Maybe you could research whether they have used federal funds and could thus be pressured to release info prior to end of public comment on rule making.
2. Congressman Henry Brown of SC roundly criticized USFWS and USGS for not being present at the hearing to answer questions. That is now public record that we can use in our arguments against rule change.
3. There are two proposals that we need to concern ourselves with right now. 1) USFWS Proposed Rule Change 2) Senate version of HR669 (likely to be introduced soon)that will try to establish a risk assessment process along with a "White" list. The guilty until proven innocent approach. It's tragic flaw is that it will likely be complicated and costly. There is no money at USFWS for that kind of proposal unless it includes funding to expand USFWS exponentially.
Skepticism is good. Skepticism is health. Look at all angles. Always question. Thanks Jim! ----- USARK
[ Hide Replies ]
- Dr Mazzotti comments on cold - USARK, Tue Mar 23 13:45:43 2010
- RE: Dr Mazzotti comments on cold - StephF, Tue Mar 23 14:58:01 2010
- RE: Dr Mazzotti comments on cold - Hiss_N_Herps, Tue Mar 23 15:14:20 2010
- Thanks Dr Mazzotti and Shawn Heflic - amazoa, Tue Mar 23 15:36:03 2010
- That's more like it! - brhaco, Tue Mar 23 16:50:02 2010
- RE: Dr Mazzotti comments on cold - CSRAJim, Wed Mar 24 09:03:26 2010
- Miami Herald on Cold/Pythons - USARK, Wed Mar 24 10:59:39 2010
- RE: Miami Herald on Cold/Pythons - StephF, Wed Mar 24 11:55:08 2010
- Perhaps you could do your own experiment - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 24 12:26:06 2010
- RE: Perhaps you could do your own experiment - StephF, Wed Mar 24 13:18:45 2010
- RE: Perhaps you could do your own experi - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 24 14:25:33 2010
- Agreed, as I wander OT once again. - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 15:54:56 2010
- RE: Agreed, as I wander OT once again. - StephF, Wed Mar 24 17:02:05 2010
- John... - brhaco, Wed Mar 24 17:26:10 2010
- RE: Agreed, as I wander OT once again. - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Thu Mar 25 07:01:23 2010
- Further... - brhaco, Thu Mar 25 08:12:30 2010
- RE: Further... - jscrick, Thu Mar 25 09:01:26 2010
- Well, - Jaykis, Fri Mar 26 20:39:10 2010
- RE: Well, - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Fri Mar 26 20:49:36 2010
- RE: Miami Herald on Cold/Pythons - natsamjosh, Wed Mar 24 13:03:55 2010
- RE: Miami Herald on Cold/Pythons - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Mar 24 19:43:34 2010
- RE: mating ball with burms???? - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 24 11:57:54 2010
- my thoughts... - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 12:22:54 2010
- 60 percent of 99 were dead? - boaphile, Wed Mar 24 13:37:12 2010
- Environment & Energy Daily - USARK, Wed Mar 24 12:50:54 2010
|