![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Venomous Reptiles ] |
Posted by: taphillip at Sun Sep 21 13:55:50 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by taphillip ] Before this rediculous pissing contest started, my intent was to find out how interested the private sector was to find some common ground with the feds on keeping venomous snakes. I am a curator at a major reptile zoo in South Dakota( my opinions are purely my own), and was contacted by the Federal Fish and Game to assist in an illegal venomous collection confiscation in Colorado of over 100 snakes, as well as several others in neighboring states. During this confiscation I spent several days with this Federal agent, who frankly is really pissed off at people keeping snakes illegally and immorally. After several days with him we came up with several good ideas for both sides of the coin, I wanted to test the water with you people on this. You people are far to defensive to hear anything other than your rights are being infringed upon. My point is all of the bites and "illegal" activity this year has really gotten the feds attention. If we all want this hobby to be here in 5 years something must be done! Access to av is a number 1 step. Florida has an av bank which is O.K. but not accessible to 49 other states (realistically) they fly serum all the way to Ohio, yet it is not needed because the zoo's in the area already supplied the serum and had much more on hand. My point is, why do zoo's have to be responsible for your mistakes? A gentleman bitten in Ohio ( or somewhere close) by his "pet" cobra required serum, the local zoo supplied the serum, their keeper was soon after bitten by a Suphan Cobra, had no more serum, so it was borrowed from another zoo, now they have no serum. See... because of one persons inablility to be prepared for a bite has put many more people at severe risk!! it's a dominoe effect! see... | ||
>> Next Message: RE: sorry, on vac. - deuce, Sun Sep 21 14:22:32 2003 >> Next Message: RE: sorry, on vac. - shadindigo, Sun Sep 21 16:08:39 2003 >> Next Message: ha ha immorally owned snake ha ha - budman 1st, Sun Sep 21 20:29:21 2003 >> Next Message: RE: sorry, on vac. - Larry D. Fishel, Mon Sep 22 01:51:27 2003 >> Next Message: I think you really need to look at TJ and My comments below... - oreganus, Mon Sep 22 03:33:51 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|