 | mobile - desktop |
|
 |
 Contact Sales! |
| mobile - desktop |
|
|
Contact Sales! |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: Candoia1 at Thu May 6 23:04:42 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Candoia1 ] Actually, with your theory, the punnet square is useless and pointless. It is just luck of the draw. And every egg does have a 50% chance of being male and female unless termperature manipulation is used which does work with some reptiles thus completely rendering your theory useless once again. The fact that me and thousands of other breeders have bred albinos and paradoxs to hets and have gotten the same results time after time is the kind of PROOF that I rely on, not hypotheticals and theories. You use your punnet square to prove a point and you ignore another point. Your punnet of a het to a homozyogous shows that an egg has a 50% chance of being an albino or a het. It also is used to show that 2 out of 4 or 50 out of 100 should appear. Any other results would mean that the gene is working in something other than a recessive way. If I breed a hypo to a normal and get all hypos, my hypo is called a super hypo. Or with your theroy, a very lucky luck of the draw. I do follow what you are saying, but I still say these were more than just really good odds. Either way, I have plenty of time to work it all out. [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Taking Mother off eggs a 1st - Herp_Herp_Hooray, Thu May 6 07:09:24 2010 << Previous topic: Spider Het for Albino In Ovulation. - thunderpaws, Tue May 4 22:49:55 2010 | ||
|
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
| ||||||||
RE: Wrong image posted - Sorry. - Candoia1, Thu May 6 23:04:42 2010
