 | mobile - desktop |
|
 |
 3 months for $50.00 |
| mobile - desktop |
|
|
3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: Candoia1 at Fri May 7 11:43:28 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Candoia1 ] This is the "theory" I spoke of above. This would render the punnet square useless. But this has never been seen in balls. Your example was a non existent one. No one to date has had a visual albino that, as you said, was actually only a het. It simply has not happened. And while I agree with you that the punnet square represents a per egg chance, it cannot be denied that it also can be used, with somewhat reliability, to determine a clutchs statistical numbers prior to hatching. And using this, which 99.9% of breeders do, my clutch here was one of those that has defied the odds if not onto something different altogether. I don't think anyone here is willing to by the Chimera bit, especially with such a complete lack of evidence. [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Taking Mother off eggs a 1st - Herp_Herp_Hooray, Thu May 6 07:09:24 2010 << Previous topic: Spider Het for Albino In Ovulation. - thunderpaws, Tue May 4 22:49:55 2010 | ||
|
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
| ||||||||
RE: Proven Chimeras - Candoia1, Fri May 7 11:43:28 2010
