Of course the study is not 100% conclusive. Nothing is 100% conclusive. But when taken along with all the other circumstantial evidence and common sense, it's pretty obvious that "irresponsible pet owners" were not the cause of the Everglades burm population.

And of course your are STILL AVOIDING providing any evidence to back up your claims. You are like a Creationist or defense lawyer. All you can do is handpick individual pieces and nitpick at the theories of others, you provide nothing to back up your beliefs.

Interestingly enough, what little "evidence" the "experts" provide to show that:

1) pet owners are irresponsibly releasing pythons, and
2) the pythons are ecologically "wreaking havoc"

are fuly of "may"'s,"might be"'s, "could be"'s and hand-picked anecdotes from a small sample size. Actually, I don't think there really is any evidence at all to support number one, at least I haven't seen any.

Stop tap dancing, Steph. Back up your claims. Or continue to look like a trolling hypocrite. It's your choice.

[ Show Entire Thread ]