John,



No worries man...No matter how many of these we look at...Whether it's a state bill of a federal one...It's the same formula from the same agenda...



Funny thing though is that upon analysis and in comparison to what the AR crowd is attempting to accomplish and using their definitions (from their regulations), what they are "selectively" attempting to do is to "selectively" apply the law to eliminate ALL animals in captivity with the "selective" exclusion of themselves (e.g. zoos, universities/colleges, research, and the government themselves)!



When you think about it, you can ONLY conclude that this is their ultimate objective. Now add in the fact that by their definitions just what would be permitted here in the Uunited States? Of ALL of the domesticated species of animals (e.g. poultry, hogs, cattle & dairy cows, dogs, cats, etc), how many of them are "native" to North America?



Now consider inspections...How many of the "domesticated" species are inspected, both before and after processing? What about the hunters and fishermen? How much of their "permitted take" is inspected? Now consider diseases, hybridization or invasive species, how many of these threats don't already exist in nature? All three of these criteria apply in-situ so using their own criteria to "save the public", the in-situ animals have to go...This is ridiculous right? Well, this is how ridiculous their rules, regulations, laws, etc really are...



Every rule, regulation and law that they are allowed to pass is just another brick in the AR agenda "regulatory" wall, that just keeps getting higher and higher, making it more and more difficult to keep animals (of most any kind) in private captive husbandry. So what can we conclude here?



Later,

Jim.
-----
CSRAJim

[ Show Entire Thread ]