John & Brad,



And throw in the 5th Amendment (private property)...



What's interesting that it was a 5-4 decision! One more Supreme like Ginsberg, Soto-Mayor and now Ragan and it’ll be a 4-5 decision to reverse…Remember it was this court just a few years ago that rendered a 4-5 decision to reverse eminent domain…Which required congressional action (as specified in the Constitution and described in the Federalist) to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision…Because it was congress that acted, the eminent domain case cannot be reversed (prevent future action under the same legal precedent) and therefore, the government (local) was able to “take” private land for tax purposes (ncreased revenue of business taxes versus property taxes)…



The Founder’s put the 2nd Amendment there to ensure the 1st Amendment…



Later,

Jim.


-----
CSRAJim

[ Hide Replies ]

• Supreme Court Gun Ruling - jscrick, Mon Jun 28 19:29:44 2010
• Delete "Closely" correction - jscrick, Mon Jun 28 19:36:15 2010
• RE: Supreme Court Gun Ruling - brhaco, Tue Jun 29 08:53:13 2010
• RE: Supreme Court Gun Ruling - jscrick, Tue Jun 29 09:25:03 2010
• RE: Supreme Court Gun Ruling - CSRAJim, Tue Jun 29 10:39:08 2010