Tom,



Thanks man but we already knew this...No matter where we live, we've seen the "scientific method" in practice as we learned it from either school (back when it was still a "classical" education), from experience of just growing up in the boonies or on a farm or a combination of the two...Experimentation, observation and/or a combination of the two. And to think we're just amateurs...Hardly. You've been advocating this "stuff" for years man...



These days, it's been redefined with the incorporation of the "social science" as this is the only way the "scientific method" can be comprimised to allow for opinion (propaganda)...Which by design allows for the dialectic, a false premise to justify their "truth"...A fact is a fact. Whether it's from history or science...Unfortunately, a fact can be detrimental to the desired outcome so the obvious solution is to allow for grant supported debate outside of science to achieve the desired result...Even if it's NOT supported by facts!



How else can "they" justify the expenditure of millions of tax dollars to subsidize failure...It's by design to allow for "social justice" outside of scientific fact to support the "protectionism" of their approved "special interests"...



More bluntly, what we're witnessing is nothing more than Fabian socialism which was used to subvert Great Britain...Which is basically the creation of the "welfare state" - which includes the "special interest" class - by using regulation (laws) from the government class over time to destroy a country from within...In other words, it's death of a country's economy and sovereignty by a 1,000 cuts...



Simply stated, socialism is public control of the private means of production, distribution and exchange that includes subsidies to protect their "special interest" facilitators under the guise of private memberships...Do you have a different explanation?



Later,

Jim.
-----
CSRAJim

[ Show Entire Thread ]