pythons4pets,



>>I understand what you're saying. I don't agree with everything that PETA stands for, one of them being their stance on "responsible breeding" whereby their aim is to restrict all breeding, even those who love animals and take the best care and apply responsible husbandry. I understand their reasoning for it, but it takes it too far.



What reasoning is this when "it takes it too far"?



>>On the other hand, I also understand that PETA isn't interested in taking people's pets/animals that are well cared for to have them set them free.



Unfortunately you are wrong about this...Do some more research..."Set them free"?



>>They advocate dogs and cats population be reduced through spaying and neutering. I don't have a problem with that, do you?



No I don't but this is the PR that they want you to see...They don't tell you about the other stuff...Like the fact that they are in the LAND acquisition business (and I'm not talking about land for animal shelters)...



>>Like anything, there's always two sides to every story, I'd rather inform myself of all sides, and not fall into someone's hysterical assumptions. I'll take your advice but I'm not interested in coming here to be told what news I should and shouldn't watch.



Then you should read EVERYTHING available, meaning the pro and con of HSUS and PETA...



Later,

Jim.




-----
CSRAJim

[ Show Entire Thread ]