mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: phoenix50 at Mon Jul 19 11:59:17 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by phoenix50 ] Steve and I agree that more work needs to be done; much more. First we have to also prove that this isn't a fluke (unlikely) with the incubation period (for the naysayers). We plan to do by pairing my proven pair again and adding Steve's unproven female to the mix. If things pan out, we will (hopefully) produce a male visual to put back to the females. After this is done. The male visual needs to be put to some of the more common morphs. I am thinking of using Pastel, since this is the most commonly recognized morph as our base; Steve may also have other ideas. From there, it should be easy (I hope) to spot any differences that the combination of genes would create in the base morph. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: A brand new RECESSIVE morph! - sanchezk, Mon Jul 19 12:10:38 2010 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: A brand new RECESSIVE morph! - Pitoon, Mon Jul 19 11:42:42 2010 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|