Posted by:
draybar
at Sun Jul 25 18:30:15 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by draybar ]
>>>>I think most of the diffused patterned animals have their own names (plasma, pewter, etc.). The point I've been repeatedly try to make here is that bloodred consists of two genes - it is not a simple recessive genetic trait.
>>>>
>>>>And as I said before, diffused is a simple recessive genetic trait. Bloodred and diffused are not the same thing (despite some people using the terms interchangeably). To call a normal-looking snake het for bloodred is not correct.
>>>>
>>>>I think I've been making the same point over and over again in this thread - what's so difficult to understand?
>>>>
>>>>Do you agree that two traits are at play? If so, how can a normal-looking snake be het for bloodred? At best it could be a double het. That's how every other simple recessive morph works.
>>>>
>>>>Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>what is the second gene...one is diffused right? what is the second one?
>>don't get pissed, I am asking to learn.
actually if you are saying diffused has nothing to do with bloodred then what are the TWO or genes
can't be het snow...it's het anery het amel
can't be het bloodred so what are the two genes that do make bloodred?
-----
Corn snakes and rat snakes...No one can have just one.
"Resistance is futile"
Jimmy Johnson
(Draybar)
Draybars Snakes
_____
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: I agree - draybar, Sun Jul 25 18:30:15 2010