Posted by:
EdK
at Mon Aug 2 15:17:54 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by EdK ]
Hi John,
Then they simply may be getting away with a bending or breaking of the "rules" as the definition under the ADA (which is what the guy with the iguana is claiming) is pretty clear on that point,
quote "The crime deterrent effects of an animalīs presence and the provision of emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship do not constitute work or tasks for the purposes of this definition"endsquote
You can claim companion animal etc but you can't use the ADA for it..
Ed
[ Hide Replies ]
|