First, excellent job! Keep them coming!

Second, my two cents on the naming question, though as a science nerd not a herp breeder.

I'm big on "truth in advertising", and like to know about the genetics/development side of things. I like names that hint at the mechanism (e.g. anerythristic, hypomelanistic, Tyrosinase-/+, etc.) and am less of a fan of names that feel like an advertising agency came up with them (e.g. sunglow, candy cane, clown, etc.)

Basically - whatever name you pick, keep it simple and descriptive. Including something to distinguish it from other similar lines might be as simple as throwing a "Sancho" or your name into the label. These snakes are attractive enough that a flashy name would be totally unnecessary!!

[ Hide Replies ]

• The Proof is in the Pudding - Yani45, Sun Aug 1 10:50:59 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - Pit_fan, Sun Aug 1 11:49:23 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - monklet, Sun Aug 1 12:16:19 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - RossCA, Sun Aug 1 13:03:34 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - alstotton, Sun Aug 1 15:17:39 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - Ryan_Sikola, Sun Aug 1 23:58:10 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - Jeremy Pierce, Mon Aug 2 11:35:06 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - Jason Nelson, Mon Aug 2 20:44:09 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - KenRoshak, Mon Aug 2 21:50:02 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - PaulJH, Tue Aug 3 13:12:39 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - reako45, Wed Aug 4 11:59:38 2010
• RE: The Proof is in the Pudding - ShaunRoberson, Wed Aug 4 20:54:01 2010