I think it is simply a matter of good business practices for the "pay for view" organizations/businesses to do what they can to eliminate the competition.

Those that offer pretty much the same fare for nothing stand in direct competition and do damage to the rarity and exotic mystique that is a large part of the draw for a paying audience.

Doesn't it seem reasonable, if such animals were commonplace and easily seen for nothing, fewer would want to pay to come see them?

Pretty much a no-brainer. Monopolies always seem to be more profitable. That's why we have "unfair trade practices" laws here in the U.S.

jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

[ Show Entire Thread ]