Posted by:
Doug T
at Mon Nov 8 09:30:32 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Doug T ]
We're off topic now... but might as well keep it going until we've been booted. The voting record of a politician being consistent with the will of his constituents is not good evidence of him not being most concerned about being re-elected. It's quite the opposite. I even just went to your guys website and what did I see... the same type of red-herring political ad you are saying people shouldn't be watching. He's the same.
Let's take a step back here. A little over a generation ago, the Republicans tried to get universal health care passed. The Democrats fought hard against it, calling it too expensive and un-american, and won. Now we have complete role reversal with the parties. What has changed? The only change is who is in power.
What's ahead? Expect to see less efforts on banning herps (good) and more effort on trying to ban flag burning, inserting superstition into gov't, and no real effort to reduce debt.
>>With out getting to off topic, I have checked on the voting record of Steve Chabot in Ohio, and over the last 20 years, I cant disagree with any vote that he has made. You may not agree with his voting record, but he has voted the will of his constituents for 20 years !!! Not an earmark or kick back kind of guy. The only way to see what your rep is doing, is to vote them up or down based upon how they represent their district. They can say what they want, because most voters are way too lazy to look into the voting records. They watch the ads ???? Less gov't is the only way baby !!! Please dont label all R's one way and D's another. It shows that you may be lazy.
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: conflicted... - Doug T, Mon Nov 8 09:30:32 2010