Posted by:
pitoon
at Tue Nov 9 16:13:26 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by pitoon ]
you try a punnett square with what you mentioned below with mutiple genes and tell me the outcome....
Pitoon
>>Nope. The relationship between the alleles is relative. When comparing two alleles, the more dominant one is given the capital letter.
>>
>>Codominant Morph:
>>Super Pastel = PP
>>Pastel = Pp
>>Normal = pp
>>
>>Because the Pastel gene is only somewhat dominant to the Normal gene. That is why you get partitial expression (codominance).
>>
>>Now, when you look at a simple recessive morph such as Albino, the morph gene is recessive to the normal gene.
>>
>>Recessive Morph:
>>Normal = AA
>>Het. Albino = Aa
>>Albino = aa
>>
>>And, just to be clear, here is an example of a dominant gene. In this case, the normal gene is completely recessive to the morph gene.
>>
>>Dominant Morph:
>>Champagne = HH
>>Champagne = Hh
>>Normal = hh
>>
>>
>>Once again, this isn't my opinion or interpretation, this can be found in any bio textbook.
>>
>>This website explains it in greater detail:
>>Inheritance patterns
>>
>>-----
>>Lincoln, NE
>>0.1 Pastel, 1.0 Pastel het Pied, 0.1 Pied, 0.1 Cinn, 1.0 Black Pewter, 1.0 Woma (hidden gene?), 0.1 Yellowbelly
>>2.0 Normals, 1.0 Thayeri, 0.1 Thayeri X Alterna, 0.1 crazy cat, 1.0 husband
-----
Homepage
My BLOG
2010 European Shows
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: Backwards. - pitoon, Tue Nov 9 16:13:26 2010