Nope, Nathan IS animal rights. He says so right here:

www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=1710

"I am an animal rights activist. I wear the appellation of animal rights as a badge of honor. It is unfortunate that some people hate the term. It is unfortunate that some animal rescuers hate the term. And it is unfortunate that some No Kill advocates hate the term. I am an animal lover and a lawyer and as we live in a legal Republic, that is what my aim is. I have argued that the term 'animal rights' is not going away, and it shouldn’t. It is a term intended to put the No Kill movement in line with other social justice movements—to cash in on the heritage of other rights based philosophies that have benefited from building on the work of those movements which have come before them. It is a powerful term which accurately encapsulates what the No Kill movement is seeking for dogs and cats. And, when it comes to these animals, the public is ready and willing to embrace it."

He is a very different kind of "animal rights activist" than those of HSUS, PETA, et al., though.

[ Hide Replies ]

• Achilles' Heel of HSUS, PETA, et al. - webwheeler, Sun Nov 14 12:28:27 2010
• RE: Achilles' Heel of HSUS, PETA, et al. - jscrick, Sun Nov 14 14:19:04 2010
• RE: Achilles' Heel of HSUS, PETA, et al. - PHFaust, Mon Nov 15 08:54:01 2010
• ...would be nice Cindy but... - mavericksdad, Mon Nov 15 09:24:49 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - webwheeler, Mon Nov 15 11:10:54 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - PHFaust, Wed Nov 17 09:52:11 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - webwheeler, Wed Nov 17 11:21:38 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - wireptile, Wed Nov 17 11:51:25 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - PHFaust, Wed Nov 17 09:40:01 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - webwheeler, Wed Nov 17 11:13:33 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - PHFaust, Wed Nov 17 22:00:52 2010
• RE: ...would be nice Cindy but... - webwheeler, Wed Nov 17 23:27:30 2010