![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Rat Snakes ] |
Posted by: KevinM at Thu Dec 9 10:28:20 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by KevinM ] Jim, Doug and I had a pretty lengthy conversation last night regarding views on the taxonomy of the E. obsoleta complex. My opinion is gravitating towards all the E. obsoleta complex being basically the same animal genotypically, but with geographical varieties or phenotypes being observed in nature. This phenotypical expression (and possibly "minor" deviations to genotypical expression??) can include other features such as overall size/robustness/lithness, habitat preference, etc., as well as the more observable color/pattern differences. However, strip all coloration from the various "subspecies" and they all are basically the same snake from what I can tell. As far as range maps are concerned, you can overlay range maps from several peer-reviewed scientific sources and see definite differnces of ranges. These range sources are not meant to be end-all definitions IMO and are always open to change based on new information being added all the time. Also, add to the mix that some folks will still label a variant or subspecies from certain areas as having "influence" from neighboring variants or subspecies. This led to a question I posed to Doug of "When does a variation/subspecies stop showing influences from neighboring variants/subspecies and start becoming classified as a true integrade?" [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: couple pictures - draybar, Sun Dec 5 17:42:04 2010 << Previous topic: took some pictures - Sonya, Sun Dec 5 13:41:16 2010 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|