Posted by:
KevinM
at Mon Dec 13 14:56:20 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by KevinM ]
I agree Jeff. With the advancement of amateur herpetology I believe we are seing a HUGE influx in data regarding the taxonomy and phenotypical classification of all the "favorite" genera and species within. I personally believe the shift from common names to locality based names will create better mental images regarding the phenotype being referred to during communication. As you stated, these names were given to the snakes by us and the snakes could give a rats butt less what they are being called by us LOL!
I think the L.alterna fans have it right. Regardless of the myriad of phenotypes and forms of L.alterna floating around out there, they are still all L.alterna without any subspeciation. However, preservation of locality in breeding programs is the key to preserving the unique phenotypes and forms from those areas in captivity as best as possible.
[ Hide Replies ]
|