mobile - desktop |
3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Herp Law Center & Forum ] |
Posted by: aquick at Wed Dec 15 20:59:13 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by aquick ] Or even regional organization instead of state level (as I fear in some states membership may be too small to properly organize). This way resources could be pooled as well. Just as a for instance, due to population differences a state level of USARK in Ohio and Pennsylvania would have much more members (and therefore money) than say a West Virginia chapter of USARK. But if these three states and say MD, DE, NJ, VA and KY were pooled together in a Mid-Atlantic chapter, more resources would be available to the smaller states. Or even both types of organization, all feeding resources to the national level. I feel that some sort of sub-division would really help USARK long-term, not only in ability to fight local and state anti-herp legislation, but to bring in herp-friendly legislation as well as promote USARKs' mission of education. Perhaps something to think about after S373 is defeated (I'm confident lol)? [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: BC (FL) Press: Unusual pets, ? results - W von Papineäu, Thu Dec 16 09:32:35 2010 << Previous topic: OT-Politicians above the law, or not... - EricWI, Sun Dec 12 21:03:12 2010 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|