Posted by:
Bolitochrome
at Tue Jan 4 18:39:56 2011 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Bolitochrome ]
Those percentages would only work if I have a Heterozygous Woma, but I was told he came from a Woma X Woma breeding (this was all before the Hidden Gene paradox entered the equation). I assume he may have been trying for the elusive Pearl as well. So I may have a 100% chance of Womas and 25% of Cinns if he's homozygous. In the end, it is all moot though. I'll just be happy to have a rack of babies before the end of 2011.
I'm quite good at punnet squares. I was just looking for confirmation from other breeders whether the Woma was dominant or not.
-----
Lincoln, NE
0.1 Pastel, 1.0 Pastel het Pied, 0.1 Pied, 0.1 Cinn, 1.0 Black Pewter, 1.0 Woma (hidden gene?), 0.1 Yellowbelly
2.1 Normals, 1.0 Thayeri, 0.1 Thayeri X Alterna, 0.1 Whitesided P. catenifer sayi, 0.1 crazy cat, 1.0 husband
[ Hide Replies ]
- Any news? - Bolitochrome, Tue Jan 4 08:22:38 2011
|
RE: Super Woma v. Super Hidden Gene...? - Bolitochrome, Tue Jan 4 18:39:56 2011