![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
|
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: wohlerswi at Tue Jan 4 21:49:35 2011 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by wohlerswi ] The hidden gene woma shouldnt even be in the equation. It has the same name, but is a completely different morph then what you have. The hidden gene woma has a super which is the pearl. You have to think of true woma's as the same as spiders. There is no such thing as a woma that when bred to a wild type would produce all womas (unless you seriously hit great odds). Like wise with a spider. There is no spider in existence that will produce all spiders when bred to a wild type. When you breed two spiders together you get all spiders, but the offspring when bred will act like every other spider and produce half spider half normal babies. Two womas together you get all womas. The resulting babies would also be like every other woma and produce half womas and half normals. There is no such thing as a super spider or a super woma. There is no such thing as het. woma or het. spider. When you breed your woma to a cinny you will get 25% woma 25% cinny 25% woma cinny and 25% normal. If the breeder of your woma misled you with what you have then I am sorry, but anyway you look at it there is no such thing. I think I have told you this before in previous discussion about spiders? Anyway hope this helps. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Super Woma v. Super Hidden Gene...? - Bolitochrome, Tue Jan 4 22:38:17 2011 >> Next Message: RE: Super Woma v. Super Hidden Gene...? - goombasreptiles, Sun Jan 9 00:50:11 2011 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Super Woma v. Super Hidden Gene...? - Bolitochrome, Tue Jan 4 18:39:56 2011 | ||
|
|
|
|