Posted by:
bwatt
at Wed Jan 12 13:37:03 2011 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by bwatt ]
Oh yeah, that part is great. There were just a few times that I thought a brawl would break out. It's probably just that I am new to the forums and don't know the personalities on here yet. With only this thread, what was probably good natured ribbing seemed like cranky insults. This is the problem with written word and no context.
I really do appreciate all your help. To clarify, it sounds like opals are a special, elite form of triple homo, maybe even quadruple homo, while pearl might be used to describe other triples? Is that right, or did I miss something? Maybe I should just stick with referring to them as triple homo and leave it at that?
[ Hide Replies ]
- snows vs. pearls??? - bwatt, Sun Jan 9 04:11:16 2011
- RE: snows vs. pearls??? - DMong, Sun Jan 9 12:33:13 2011
- WRONG - Jeff Schofield, Sun Jan 9 14:16:48 2011

- RE: WRONG - SHANNON BROWN, Sun Jan 9 15:00:22 2011
- RE: WRONG - Jeff Schofield, Sun Jan 9 15:08:05 2011
- LMAO!!! - DMong, Sun Jan 9 15:26:56 2011
- RE: WRONG - bwatt, Sun Jan 9 15:28:03 2011
- RE: WRONG - tspuckler, Sun Jan 9 15:46:33 2011

- RE: WRONG - DMong, Sun Jan 9 15:55:17 2011
- RE: WRONG - Bigtattoo, Sun Jan 9 18:53:37 2011
- RE: WRONG - tspuckler, Sun Jan 9 19:04:25 2011

- RE: WRONG - DMong, Sun Jan 9 20:14:57 2011
- RE: WRONG - Bigtattoo, Mon Jan 10 04:25:31 2011
- Do you still have the Pearl? - RG, Mon Jan 10 08:09:15 2011

- RE: snows vs. pearls??? - Don Shores, Sun Jan 9 20:56:35 2011

- The correct term would be "Opal" since.. - rodneyj, Sun Jan 9 20:31:39 2011
- RE: snows vs. pearls??? - bwatt, Wed Jan 12 02:46:07 2011
|