Posted by:
jscrick
at Thu Feb 10 09:50:59 2011 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by jscrick ]
What Rhoda is basically saying is that his climate study is worthless, alone as a determinate for python spread.
He dismisses the other study as having too many variables that exclude the spread...while at the same time saying his study alone is irrelevant and only hypothetical theory babble.
The context of his comments are undeniable. When people are too smart for their own good...
jsc ----- "As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer
[ Hide Replies ]
|