![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: perfectpredators at Wed Feb 23 19:36:52 2011 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by perfectpredators ] brandon if you say this that jeff said i believe you. I browse the forums and find a thread here and there that catch my fancy but I am not familiar with all posts by all people by any means. however having said that last i checked his comments he said based on littermates showing zero signs of bcc influence they are bci pure. And can i add, theres no certainty in the world other than death i suppose, and therefore Jeff HAD to make that statement. Outside of the KWB looking extraordinary, nothing else in the litter does or rather looks bccish if you will. why is that? shouldnt there be 1 here and there? Why cant people just accept the KWB as PERHAPS a morph that makes whats not so nice about a regular BCI look super nice. I think genes have done crazier things to a BCI such as look at what the motley gene does to the pattern, or the aztec gene, or the Jungle etc. I think its not a far fetched notion based on how "funky" other genes make boas look and the litter mates being normal looking "nothing specials" that this could be a bci with 99.9% certainty. Its just that i read a few threads and some people seem that they're very sure like 100% about the crossing and I am left wondering where is the evidence? is it looks? well are the siblings being taken into account if you're going off of looks? obviously not, if you take this as you would a science project you then have to take into account ALL the evidence and not just the one that suits your argument. thats how things go wrong fast. Then and therefore when you take into account ALL the evidence calling this a cross is just wrong. Somehow people have it in their head that theres bcc and you cannot reason with people that just dont want to see whats in front of them..i have 25% BCC integrates, im outcrossed them with BCI yet again and you always have those babies that are more like the BCC side and these are like 4 generations removed from their bcc ancestor, you see the same with the argentine crossings where you'll see those funky ones, well wheres the funky siblings in the KWB?... | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Manny - BNixon, Wed Feb 23 21:30:11 2011 >> Next Message: RE: Manny - Jonathan_Brady, Wed Feb 23 22:46:56 2011 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Manny - Jonathan_Brady, Wed Feb 23 17:48:03 2011 | ||
|
|
|
|