Posted by:
zippy00_99
at Thu Mar 10 10:22:34 2011 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by zippy00_99 ]
I like to look at things logically. Yes, I know, that kind of thinking has bitten me a couple of times, but It works a lot of times. I am thinking that if you have a pastel, you need another copy of pastel to make a super pastel, so it takes 2 copies of pastel to make a super pastel....so... you need TWO morphs to make it. A pastel...and...a pastel. Two morphs.....2 copies......double morph......super pastel is a double morph. I also believe that a morph needs to be visual, so a pastel pied would still be a double morph. A normal that is 100% het for (whatever) is not a morph. A pied is a single morph. A pastel het pied is a single morph, but a super pastel pied is a triple morph cause you still need 2 copies of pastel, so.... that is just me. I am not trying to bang anything home, I am just stating how I think of this topic.
[ Hide Replies ]
- combos - TerryHeuring, Mon Mar 7 18:10:43 2011
- RE: combos - JYohe, Mon Mar 7 18:25:55 2011
- RE: combos - TerryHeuring, Mon Mar 7 20:22:22 2011
- RE: combos - lairofdragons, Mon Mar 7 22:31:19 2011
- RE: combos - BAM_Reptiles, Mon Mar 7 23:23:34 2011
- RE: combos - jackjebus, Tue Mar 8 05:10:41 2011
- RE: combos - TheSerpentsCoil, Tue Mar 8 23:18:31 2011
- RE: combos - TerryHeuring, Wed Mar 9 20:30:24 2011
- RE: combos - Paul Hollander, Thu Mar 10 08:06:33 2011
 RE: combos - zippy00_99, Thu Mar 10 10:22:34 2011
|
