>>"USGS stated, “This document was not designated by the USGS as a highly influential scientific document”"

>>

>>That is very telling. Can anyone tell me then, why this report was even cited at all by USGS in regards to S373 and this whole rule making process??



Guys,



what did you all expect? Like other executive agencies, the doi is full of corruption and agenda pushing. If anyone stiill thinks this is still a case of one or two rogue scientists, I've got a bridge to sell..

[ Hide Replies ]

• USGS Denies Due Process to Reptile Indus - jscrick, Tue Apr 19 13:14:10 2011
• RE: USGS Denies Due Process to Reptile Indus - EricWI, Tue Apr 19 18:19:21 2011
• RE: USGS Denies Due Process to Reptile Indus - bivittatus, Wed Apr 20 10:57:37 2011
• RE: USGS Denies Due Process to Reptile Indus - jscrick, Wed Apr 20 11:28:24 2011
• RE: USGS Denies Due Process to Reptile Indus - jaykis, Wed Apr 20 11:30:39 2011
• RE: USGS Denies Due Process to Reptile I - natsamjosh, Wed Apr 20 12:07:22 2011
• Very DISINGENUOUS!!! - jscrick, Wed Apr 20 12:50:45 2011
• RE: USGS Denies Due Process to Reptile Indus - norajohn, Tue Apr 19 18:45:10 2011
• $300,000 budget??!?! for what? - np - Hugh_Jass, Mon Apr 25 15:49:45 2011