Posted by:
Bolitochrome
at Tue Jan 31 18:23:45 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Bolitochrome ]
I read the article and reached a similar conclusion. The surveying for the Burms seemed legit. The surveying for the mammals is common practice, and acceptable. But using the data from one to explain the results of the latter is tenuous at best. Albeit, I am possibly biased.
-----
25 year old 0.1 from Lincoln, NE
Ball Pythons - 0.1 Pastel, 1.0 Pastel het Pied, 0.1 Pied, 0.1 Cinn, 1.0 Black Pewter, 1.0 Woma (hidden gene?), 0.1 Yellowbelly, 2.1 Normals
Kingsnakes - 1.0 L. m. thayeri, 0.1 L. m. thayeri X L. alterna, 1.0 L. g. californiae
Other - 0.1 Whitesided P. catenifer sayi, 1.0 H. nascicus, ?.? Chrysemys picta, 0.1 crazy cat, 1.0 husband
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|
