 | mobile - desktop |
|
 |
 Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
| mobile - desktop |
|
|
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: Warren_Booth at Fri Mar 9 10:00:36 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Warren_Booth ] There are too many variables to even consider running morphs against wild types. To start with, you will need to run multiple from each lineage in order to reduce the likelihood that you are seeing simple variation across lineages. In the end, you will not come out with the gene of interest. You will end with a number of genes that MAY be involved. As someone using 454 and illumina regularly for my research, I can tell you its not as easy as people might think. Additionally, to do these runs is not exactly cheap. Furthermore, in order to insure accuracy you need sufficient coverage of the genome and that is even more expensive. [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: WV to BAN EVERYTHING not domesticated! - dangles, Tue Mar 6 23:05:21 2012 << Previous topic: Help - any experienced microscope users? - dwherp, Mon Mar 5 12:47:57 2012 | ||
|
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
| ||||||||
RE: Fake Hets and Parthenogenesis - Warren_Booth, Fri Mar 9 10:00:36 2012
