Posted by:
LarM
at Fri May 4 15:45:44 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by LarM ]
Honestly Jb , in this case I'm speculating but I agree with Doctor Booth I think the best bet is that the fem had Partho litter.
I certain the Harle Boas have much if anything to do with this genetic anomaly.
Your question is still valid though, those animals that produced the Sterling Boas may just be descendants
of this large Fem that produced the "Harle" patternless Boas.
I'm not certain but I read some info in my research yesterday that hinted at the fact that this Fem
has produced at least two litters since the "Harle" Patternless litter of 2005.
She produced no patternless Boas since that 2005 litter until this
recent litter of Jr Bannister we see here on KS Forum.
It could be that her offspring (50% of her offspring in any given litter ) carry the trait.
Ken who produced Sterling Boas possibly purchased two nice
pastels that were siblings from this large Matriarch
of the Patternless 2005 Harle litter. ----- Boas By Klevitz

I Support USark.org
[ Hide Replies ]
- patternless babies - jrbannister0726, Thu May 3 08:09:07 2012
- RE: patternless babies - jrbannister0726, Thu May 3 08:10:20 2012
- what was? - aboaslife, Thu May 3 08:14:41 2012
- RE: patternless babies - apreske, Thu May 3 08:38:24 2012
- RE: patternless babies - ajfreptiles, Thu May 3 09:13:47 2012
- RE: patternless babies - forest, Thu May 3 10:01:56 2012
- RE: patternless babies - amp, Thu May 3 10:14:19 2012
- RE: patternless babies - summitreptiles, Thu May 3 10:41:44 2012
- RE: patternless babies - Tracy Barker, Thu May 3 11:35:57 2012
- RE: patternless babies - Warren_Booth, Thu May 3 11:41:00 2012
- Revolutionary! - tcdrover, Thu May 3 12:05:56 2012
- RE: patternless babies - Morphism, Thu May 3 12:43:10 2012
- RE: patternless babies - maizeysdad, Thu May 3 13:12:44 2012
- spelling - maizeysdad, Thu May 3 13:14:55 2012
|