No one said its simple, but you have to start somewhere and simple is a great place to start.

So simply put, you have to explain how we can accomplish what you make rules against. After you attempt that, maybe we can pick an area that little by little try to understand it.

As it is, your folks attack this as religion(and please, the word religion is believing in something without proof) In this case, you choose all manner of separate an out of context examples as proof of your point. But you cannot explain our success. Sir, you can pick anything you like, but what does that have to do with our being able to do what you say cannot be done.

No offense, but I/we pioneered the use of the sweaterbox and rack system. It had a context and that was the commerical breeding of colubrid snakes. It was never meant for keepers. They are suppose to enjoy their snakes, and learn from them.

But sadly, I am so very sorry I/we ever came up with that system. Inventors regret. I wonder if Braun regrets the Abomb. see, humor, bad humor but humor just the same. Bluerosy humor.

[ Show Entire Thread ]