" As for bonding...yes you've answered my questions. You put your kings in groups in cages, believe they prefer it this way because you think it is natural, and yet have no evidence whatsoever to back up your statements. It's merely opinions of yours. And like I've said over and over, if your kings do fine in groups in their cages, then great. Success in keeping and breeding them has been proven to be successful both ways. But trying to say your way is better and that everyone else should follow suit is plain out nonsense. Why not just share your information without trying to convert everyone to your way of thinking? It's also best if you're trying to do so if you can actually back up your statements. Otherwise, people will know you're just BSing them. "

Trust me, people do know already, and have known for years.

The definition of bonding is: The development of a close relationship between family members or friends.

Those that try to impose, in a very childish way mind you, the act of supposedly bonding snakes, feed the living heck out of their snakes, and are known as pushers. " Feed, feed, feed, " is what you will see. Keeping the living tar fed outta them reduced hunger cravings, and then, the snakes may appear to give the appearance of " bonding ". One of the youngsters advocating this theory says you have to bond them when they are young and are eating small adult mice.

Now, what does being young and eating small adult mice have to do with the very definition of bonding, that is, developing, a close relationship between each other? Nothing.

Anyone can figure that out. 2 2 does equal 4, right?

That is what is so funny.

Finding snakes under the same piece of trash, debris, rock, cover, is simply one thing: Snakes are utilizing the safe area, in nature, to remain safe. Why those read into that much more than they should baffles the true leaders in our herp hobby, but alas, you are dealing with humans stricken with online egos and pride.

NEXT!!!!!
-----
Genesis 1:1

[ Show Entire Thread ]