i don't think that at all. im just not understanding how animals with zero black on them cannot be considered hypos. they look very very close to my hypo that hatached last year from a het het breeding from stillwater outcrossed parents (Ginter bred the parents).



they also look a lot like several hypos ive seen floating around the net:
(http://t2.ftcdn.net/jpg/00/16/66/81/400_F_16668117_c4IfFNJk4rpTY22dEeuS7fg9PR7dqwGJ.jpg)
(http://i30.tinypic.com/2hf6m36.jpg)

as for the sunglow, its traits match that of my adult female sunglow. not sure about the eye thing jason mentioned. the adult sunglow has normal looking albino eyes as does the hatchling. and if indeed the hatchling is a hypo albino then the probablities are as follows:

HypoAlbino: 9.38%
Albino: 9.38
HypoWS (ghost): 12.51%
AlbinoWS (Snow): 3.13%
Whiteside: 9.38%
Hypo: 28.13%
Normal hets: 28.13%

as for the ghost not being a ghost.....im just not seeing how it differs from the one picture you posted. maybe better pictures will shed more light on it but it has rained every day here in the "sunshine state" since this clutch has hatched. the yellows that line the saddles are more vibrant yellow in person. it is my hold back so im not too worried if it is a ghost or not. either way, it carries the hypo gene which is what im after.

[ Show Entire Thread ]