Posted by:
Maizeysdad
at Sat Jul 28 07:32:44 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Maizeysdad ]
Thanks Doc,
My reasoning is that since the "hets," while colorful and attractive, are not remarkably different from wild type boas (at least not in the way hypos, motleys, etc. are different), and because of the ratios of Sterlings to non-Sterlings in both litters I've produced, it seems to be recessive.
Also, in the first litter (presumed het x het), there were animals that definitely looked "wild type," while the rest of the non-Sterlings have an appearance I'm considering a het marker. In the second litter (visual x het) there are no simple "wild type" looking animals. All the non-Sterlings have that particular look.
[ Hide Replies ]
|