Posted by:
john dhont
at Mon Aug 6 12:51:10 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by john dhont ]
I have some questions for the big guys on the forum here.
In one of the previous topics Al Stotton shows us some babies and you can see that they are all looking different.
Different phenoptypes is how Al discribes them.
Jason Nelson says in a reply that this is nothing special and that you can hatch different looking albino's in one clutch.
If you look at the pictures of adults, which Al Stotton just posted, you can clearly see that they are all looking totaly different.
In a post of Jason Nelson I read some babies are Dyer and others are Bechtel.
I'm very sorry but I can not follow anymore.
If you say that all the albino's in that clutch of Al Stotton are all the same why is that not counting for the clutch of Jason Nelson.
Bechtel and Dyer are just 2 different looking albino's with a name on it.
The albino's of Al Stotton also look different from each other so should we not give them also their own name?
Who has the right to give names and who does not have the right.
I don't want to offend you Jason but you also talk about Red Albino for your bullsnakes.
Very nice looking snakes as I told you many times.
Should we not just call them "red looking albino's" if you use your theory on the annectens babies of Al Stotton.
I'm not a master in genetics, but I keep and breed snakes for fun since 20 years and I see that new names are mostly given by people in the US.
Does we Europeans also have the right to give names to new types of albino?
To be honnest, the albino's Al Stotton breeds are not resembling Applegate albino's anymore.
Hope I did not offend anybody with this topic but sometimes I have problems to follow.
And sorry if my English is not perfect, English is not my native language.
[ Hide Replies ]
 Name of different types of annectens - john dhont, Mon Aug 6 12:51:10 2012
|
